gt; To:
> Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2011 4:55 PM
> Subject: Re: [tdf-discuss] Android SDK Vs NDK (WAS Oracle gives up
> onOpenOffice.org)
>
>
> I didnt even realize that was another way to develop on android :) im
> guessing both can be installed side by side?
>
> On Tue, Ap
Yes, but SDK with elipse, NDK no, find you prefered IDE and use cmake as
recommanded.
- Original Message -
From: "Jonathan Aquilina"
To:
Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2011 4:55 PM
Subject: Re: [tdf-discuss] Android SDK Vs NDK (WAS Oracle gives up
onOpenOffice.org)
I didnt ev
I didnt even realize that was another way to develop on android :) im
guessing both can be installed side by side?
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 10:53 AM, Chaosun wrote:
> >what is the difference between the two?
> NDK lets you build app in native code.
>
> >looking at android sdk it looks
> >super si
>what is the difference between the two?
NDK lets you build app in native code.
>looking at android sdk it looks
>super simple to setup and work with. all that is needed once the sdk is
>installed is a plugin for eclipse, and easy to setup a basic to a full
>android development kit.
If defining
what is the difference between the two? looking at android sdk it looks
super simple to setup and work with. all that is needed once the sdk is
installed is a plugin for eclipse, and easy to setup a basic to a full
android development kit.
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@docum
> On 10/16/2010 04:58 PM, Ian wrote:
>
>>> Which of the 200+ variants of Android should be targeted?
>
>> All those running on devices that are likely to be used in general
>> productivity.
>
> That would be all 200+ variants of Android then.
Yes. As I said implementing a web based version of LO c
On 10/16/2010 04:58 PM, Ian wrote:
>> Which of the 200+ variants of Android should be targeted?
> All those running on devices that are likely to be used in general
> productivity.
That would be all 200+ variants of Android then.
jonathon
--
No human will see non-list, non-bulk, non-junk emai
On Sat, 2010-10-16 at 16:46 +, jonathon wrote:
> On 10/16/2010 04:37 PM, Ian wrote:
> > On Sat, 2010-10-16 at 17:26 +0100, Zaphod Feeblejocks wrote:
>
> > What we need is a port of OOo to Android.
>
> Which of the 200+ variants of Android should be targeted?
All those running on devices tha
On 10/16/2010 04:37 PM, Ian wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-10-16 at 17:26 +0100, Zaphod Feeblejocks wrote:
> What we need is a port of OOo to Android.
Which of the 200+ variants of Android should be targeted?
jonathon
--
No human will see non-list, non-bulk, non-junk email sent to this address.
It all
